| Overview | Authorship | Peer Review | Plagiarism | AI Policy | Conflict of Interest | Editorial Independence | Post-Publication | Data Integrity | Copyright | Board Members | Appeals |
Overview
Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal is committed to the highest standards of research integrity and ethical publishing practice. The policies below govern all submissions, editorial decisions, and post-publication conduct. They apply equally to authors, reviewers, editors, and the publisher.
Galaxy is published by the Research Centre for English Language and Literature (RCELL) and has maintained continuous publication since 2012. The journal adheres to the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) — the internationally recognised standard for ethical scholarly publishing.
As an official Crossref member journal, Galaxy assigns a permanent DOI to every published research article from Vol. 15, Issue 2 (2026) onwards, with automatic metadata distribution across the global scholarly ecosystem.
These policies are reviewed annually. Current version: April 2026. Queries: editor@galaxyimrj.com
Section 1 — Authorship Policy
Authorship carries significant intellectual, ethical, and legal responsibility. All named authors must meet all four of the following criteria (consistent with ICMJE guidelines):
Ghost authorship — omitting a qualifying contributor from the authorship list — is strictly prohibited. Gift or honorary authorship — listing someone who made no qualifying intellectual contribution — is equally prohibited.
Authorship disputes must be resolved before submission. The journal will follow COPE guidance if a dispute arises after submission or publication. Post-submission authorship changes require written explanation and confirmation from all named authors.
Corresponding Author Responsibilities
By submitting the manuscript, the corresponding author confirms that: all co-authors have read, approved, and consented to the submission; all co-authors have agreed to the authorship order; the work has not been submitted elsewhere simultaneously; all conflicts of interest have been declared; and any AI tool use has been disclosed.
Contributors not meeting authorship criteria — those providing only technical assistance, language editing, or administrative support — should be acknowledged in an Acknowledgements section.
Section 2 — Peer Review Process
Galaxy operates a rigorous double-blind peer review process. Neither author(s) nor reviewers are aware of each other’s identities. Every manuscript is evaluated by three independent expert reviewers.
All manuscripts undergo an initial check for scope, language, formatting, plagiarism, and minimum quality threshold before entering review.
Manuscripts passing screening are sent to three independent reviewers. Authors must fully anonymise submissions — no names, affiliations, or self-identifying references anywhere in the document.
The Editor-in-Chief issues one of four decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Authors typically receive a decision within 15–20 days of the submission deadline.
Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated against reviewers’ concerns. The editor’s decision after revision is final. The journal does not operate a re-review cycle beyond one round of major revision.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Section 3 — Plagiarism & Originality
All manuscripts must be original, unpublished work not under consideration elsewhere. Plagiarism in all its forms is a fundamental breach of scholarly integrity, including:
All submitted manuscripts are screened using similarity detection software before peer review.
Before publication: The manuscript is rejected immediately. The submitting author’s institution may be notified depending on severity.
After publication: The journal investigates in accordance with COPE guidance. The article may receive a correction notice, expression of concern, or retraction. The Crossref DOI record is updated to reflect any such action. Deliberate plagiarism may result in permanent blacklisting.
Section 4 — Artificial Intelligence & Generative Tools Policy
This policy is guided by the COPE Position Statement on Authorship and AI Tools (2023). Authors may use AI tools for limited assistive tasks such as grammar checking and language editing, provided use is disclosed. The following are not permitted:
Disclosure: Any generative AI use must be declared in the submission form, specifying the tool name and version, the purpose of use, and confirming that all AI-assisted content was reviewed and verified by the author(s).
Undisclosed AI use is treated as a breach of publication ethics equivalent to plagiarism and may result in rejection, retraction, and blacklisting.
Section 5 — Conflict of Interest
All parties must declare any actual or potential conflict — financial, personal, institutional, or professional — that could be perceived as influencing their conduct or reporting.
| Party | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Authors | Declare any financial interests, institutional affiliations, personal relationships, or prior commitments that could influence the submitted work. Required in the submission form. If no conflict exists, a statement to that effect is required. |
| Reviewers | Decline the assignment if they have any personal, professional, or financial relationship with the author(s), a competing interest in the subject matter, or any factor that could compromise objectivity. |
| Editors | Recuse themselves from decisions involving manuscripts submitted by colleagues, collaborators, or institutional associates. Such manuscripts are handled by an independent editor. |
Section 6 — Editorial Board Members as Authors
Members of the Galaxy Editorial Board — including Advisory Board, Editorial Board, and Young Researchers’ Alliance members — are permitted to submit and publish research in the journal during their tenure. This is consistent with COPE guidelines for small and specialist journals. The following safeguards apply without exception:
Section 7 — Editorial Independence
“Editorial decisions are made solely on the basis of scholarly merit, originality, and relevance to the journal’s scope. No external party — commercial, institutional, political, or otherwise — has any influence over acceptance or rejection decisions.”
Section 8 — Post-Publication Policy
When errors or misconduct are identified after publication, the journal acts promptly and transparently in accordance with COPE guidelines on corrections and retractions.
A correction notice is issued when a published article contains an error that does not affect core findings but requires correction. A corrigendum covers author-originated errors; an erratum covers journal-originated errors. Both are published as a separate notice linked to the original article, and the online version is updated.
Published when credible evidence of potential misconduct exists but cannot yet be fully resolved — for example, while an institutional investigation is ongoing. It is a temporary measure, replaceable by a correction or retraction once conclusions are reached.
Issued when an article contains fundamental errors or evidence of misconduct undermining its reliability. Grounds include fabrication or falsification, plagiarism, undisclosed substantial AI generation, manipulation of peer review, and ethical violations. Retracted articles are not removed — they remain accessible but are clearly marked “RETRACTED” with date and reason. The Crossref DOI metadata is updated automatically.
Anyone who identifies a potential error or ethics concern in a published article is encouraged to contact editor@galaxyimrj.com with the full citation, DOI, and a description of the concern.
Section 9 — Research & Data Integrity
Authors must present findings honestly and accurately. The following constitute serious breaches and are grounds for rejection or retraction:
Authors who discover a significant error in their published work are obligated to notify the editorial office promptly.
Section 10 — Copyright, Licensing & Open Access
Section 11 — Appeals & Complaints
Appealing an Editorial Decision
Authors who believe a rejection was based on a factual error, misunderstanding of scope, or procedural irregularity may appeal. Appeals based solely on disagreement with reviewers’ scholarly opinions will not be considered. Email editor@galaxyimrj.com with subject line “Appeal: [Manuscript Title]” within 30 days of the decision. Include specific grounds and supporting evidence. A decision will be communicated within 30 days and is final.
Raising an Ethics Concern
Any individual with a credible concern about misconduct in a submitted or published article may contact the editorial office. Email editor@galaxyimrj.com with subject “Ethics Concern: [Article DOI or Title]”, including the citation, description of concern, evidence, and any competing interest declaration. All concerns are treated with strict confidentiality. Acknowledgement within 5 working days; substantive response within 30 days.
Complaints About Editorial Conduct
Complaints about editor or reviewer conduct should be sent to editor@galaxyimrj.com with subject “Complaint: Editorial Conduct”. If the complaint involves the Editor-in-Chief, address it to RCELL at journals@rcell.co.in. All complaints are investigated impartially with a response within 30 days.
Questions About These Policies?Contact the editorial office for queries about publication ethics, submissions, or editorial processes.
|
